Emissions from the burning of fossil fuels have driven the climate crisis and contributed to worsening extreme weather, including the current heatwaves hitting the UK and many other Northern hemisphere countries. Oil companies have known for decades that carbon emissions were dangerously heating the planet.

“I was really surprised by such high numbers – they are enormous,” said Verbruggen, an energy and environmental economist at the University of Antwerp, Belgium, and a former lead author of an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report.

“It’s a huge amount of money,” he said. “You can buy every politician, every system with all this money, and I think this happened. It protects [producers] from political interference that may limit their activities.”

Continue Reading

Thousands of potentially harmful chemicals could soon be prohibited in Europe under new restrictions, which campaigners have hailed as the strongest yet.

Earlier this year, scientists said chemical pollution had crossed a “planetary boundary” beyond which lies the breakdown of global ecosystems.

The synthetic blight is thought to be pushing whale species to the brink of extinction and has been blamed for declining human fertility rates, and 2 million deaths a year.

The EU’s “restrictions roadmap” published on Monday was conceived as a first step to transforming this picture by using existing laws to outlaw toxic substances linked to cancers, hormonal disruption, reprotoxic disorders, obesity, diabetes and other illnesses.

Continue Reading

A group of more than 500 academics on Monday called on American and British universities to ban accepting funding for climate research from fossil fuel companies.
In the letter, signatories wrote that accepting such funding undermined the academic integrity of the research it enables.
“To be clear, our concern is not with the integrity of individual academics. Rather, it is with the systemic issue posed by the context in which academics must work, one where fossil fuel industry funding can taint critical climate-related research,” the letter states.
The writers compared accepting fossil fuel funding to public health researchers accepting money from the tobacco industry, which numerous institutions already have a policy of rejecting. Those policies, they write, are based on not only the conflict of interest but also the tobacco industry’s history of obfuscating the link between its product and health issues.

Continue Reading


In response to renewed demands for the approval of Keystone XL, Biden’s spokesperson Jen Psaki said that more oil couldn’t solve the problem: “President Biden’s view is that we need to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, on oil in general and need look to other ways of having energy in our country and others.”

Canada’s Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault echoed this assessment, saying “The solution to global energy problems is not to increase our dependency to fossil fuels.”

Continue Reading

Michael Mann, an academic, told the House oversight committee the companies had known for more than four decades that their activities caused pollution, but had engaged in a “campaign of denial and delay.”

“We are now paying the price for these delays in the form of extreme weather events,” said the Pennsylvania State University atmospheric science professor.

IeRM Staff feels that this also applies to the Landfill industry.

Continue Reading

to top