Record-setting fires in the western US over the last decade caused severe air pollution, loss of human life, and property damage. Enhanced drought and increased biomass in a warmer climate may fuel larger and more frequent wildfires in the coming decades. The air quality impact of increased wildfires in a warming climate has often been overlooked in current model projections, owing to the lack of interactive fire emissions of gases and particles responding to climate change in Earth System Model (ESM) projection simulations.

This research combines multi-ensemble projections of wildfires in three ESMs (including GFDL’s ESM4) with an empirical statistical model, to predict fine particulate pollution in the late 21st century. The three ESMs were taken from the Sixth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project using several different possible scenarios of how socioeconomic factors, as well as mitigation efforts, may change in the future.

Total carbon dioxide emissions from fires over western North America during August–September are projected to increase from present-day values by 60–110% under a strong-mitigation scenario, 100–150% under a moderate-mitigation scenario, and 130–260% under a low-mitigation scenario in 2080–2100.

Continue Reading

What is the history of the lawsuit?
In 2015, during the Obama administration, the EPA finalized a flagship climate rule, dubbed the Clean Power Plan, which sought to curtail emissions from the electricity sector to at least 30% below 2005 levels by 2030. The plan would have set reductions targets for US states; to meet them, coal- and gas-burning power plants could have upgraded their technology to boost efficiency and decrease emissions, but the bulk of the reductions would have needed to come from electric utilities shifting towards more renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar. The Obama EPA said that this ‘generation shifting’ approach was consistent with the Clean Air Act, a law that requires the agency to consider the best-available technologies when crafting regulations to curb air pollution.

The more industry-friendly Trump administration repealed the Clean Power Plan in 2018 and replaced it with a weaker version dubbed the Affordable Clean Energy plan, which more narrowly interpreted the Clean Air Act. It also limited pollution controls to technologies that could be installed at individual power plants. Critics said it would do little, if anything, to encourage a broader shift towards clean energy.

The situation came to a head on Trump’s final day in office in early 2021, when a federal appeals court in Washington DC dismissed the Trump plan and rejected its repeal of the original Clean Power Plan. The new Supreme Court case, West Virginia vs Environmental Protection Agency, hinges on the fact that the appeals court expressly rejected the Trump administration’s arguments that the Clean Air Act does not authorize the EPA to require generation shifting across the electricity industry.

Continue Reading

Methane concentrations in the atmosphere raced past 1,900 parts per billion last year, nearly triple pre-industrial levels, according to data released in January by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Scientists says the grim milestone underscores the importance of a pledge made at last year’s COP26 climate summit to curb emissions of methane, a greenhouse gas at least 28 times as potent as carbon dioxide.

The growth of methane emissions slowed around the turn of the millennium, but began a rapid and mysterious uptick around 2007. The spike has caused many researchers to worry that global warming is creating a feedback mechanism that will cause ever more methane to be released, making it even harder to rein in rising temperatures.

Continue Reading

He was fined £840. The Environment Agency announced, “We hope this case will send a clear message”. It will, but not the one it intends.

It’s a familiar story: of almost total regulatory collapse. The failure of the Environment Agency’s waste register looks similar to the farce of company registration, devastatingly exposed by Oliver Bullough. This story reminds me both of the catastrophic failure to protect elderly and vulnerable people against fraud and of the dumping of raw sewage and farm manure into our rivers and seas.

All these failures are inevitable outcomes of 40 years of “cutting red tape”, of slashing the budgets of regulatory agencies, of outsourcing and self-reporting. We were promised freedom. But the people our governments have set free are criminals. Yet another filthy business is cleaning up.

Continue Reading

to top